“Fair
play in action is the soul of the principles of natural justice.”
Justice
V.R. Krishna Iyer
This
significant remark from one of India's most esteemed legal scholars embod ies
the essence of natural justice — not just as a legal concept, but as a vibrant
that tenet upholds equity, clarity and neutrality in every action of impacting
individual’s rights.
The
concept of natural justice is a fundamental principle rooted in the idea of
fairness, impartiality, and equality before the law. It is not a codified law
but a set of unwritten rules that aim to ensure just and fair decision-making.
These principles are derived from common law traditions and have evolved
through centuries of judicial interpretation and philosophical reasoning.
Natural justice forms the bedrock of procedural fairness in both judicial and
administrative proceedings and is crucial in upholding the rule of law in any
democratic society. Despite the absence of explicit legislative mandate in many
instances, courts have consistently enforced its principles to uphold the
integrity of the justice system. In an era of expanding administrative powers
and complex governance, natural justice functions as a safeguard that protects
individual rights and promotes public confidence in institutional decisions.
This
article aims to delve into the foundational principles of natural justice,
which serve as the cornerstone of fair and impartial decision-making. It will
focus primarily on its two fundamental rules: nemo judex in causa sua,
meaning no person should judge a case in which they have an interest, and audi
alteram partem, the right of an individual to be heard before a decision is
made. Through an in-depth exploration of these principles, the article will
analyse their practical application in judicial and administrative settings,
key judicial interpretations over time, and notable exceptions where natural
justice may be lawfully limited.
Please enter the email address corresponding to this article submission to download your certificate.

