The aim of the research is to examine and analyze the weaknesses of regulations on The Regional House Of Representatives Ethical Code Enforcement By The Honorary Council, and how to reconstruct the regulations based on justice value. This research was conducted using socio-juridical research which is a legal research method that functions to see the law in its real sense and examines how the law works in a society that is analytically descriptive using primary and secondary data and using the theory of pancasila justice as a grand theory. The weakness of the regulation of the Regional House of Representatives Honorary Council (BK DPRD) members largely comes from the deeply-rooted culture of courtesy, especially to higher and older members, commonly known as Ewuh Pakewuh that caused the member to become less independent in making decisions. Whereas the provisions requiring the BK DPRD to carry out investigations, verification, and clarification after receiving complaints from DPRD leaders, DPRD members, and/or the public have resulted in the BK not responding to cases without complaints which have an impact on weakening honor, dignity. the image and credibility of DPRD members. Therefore, the Legal Reconstruction of regulations for enforcing the code of ethics by the DPRD BK, namely PP No. 12 of 2018 Article 55 paragraph (1) and Article 55 paragraph (3) is reconstructed with the provision that the recruitment of BK DPRD members must not only comes from DPRD members, but also from external elements, namely academics, community leaders, religious leaders, and legal practitioners who have integrity and competence in their fields. The number of BK DPRD members from elements of society is more in number compared to the number of BK DPRD members from faction elements. Article 56 paragraph (1) letter (c) is reconstructed with regulations that examination of violations of the code of ethics by the BK DPRD can be carried out on complaints and without complaints.