The purpose of this study is to identify and explain the urgency of the revision of the Corruption Eradication Commission Law. The introduction of this research, namely the Revision of the Corruption Eradication Commission Law, hereinafter abbreviated as the revision of the KPK Law, which is the proposal of the DPR's initiative, raises pros and cons in the community, because most people think that the current KPK law does not need to be revised, some say that the process of forming the revision of the KPK law was not followed through the procedures and stages as stipulated in the law. This study will discuss issues regarding the urgency of revising the KPK law, and the procedures for establishing a good and correct law, as well as its application in the formation of a revision of the KPK law. The method used in this study is a normative juridical method using legislation in analyzing the problems that are the focus of research. The results of the study conclude that the urgency of revising the KPK Law is because Law no. 30 of 2002 is no longer in accordance with the times of the dynamics of the law and the constitutional system of the Republic of Indonesia, and the process of revising the KPK Law did not go through the procedures as regulated in “Law no. 12 of 2011 concerning the Establishment of Legislations” resulting in defects in terms of procedures for establishing good and correct laws and regulations.